National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  登录 机构网站 ENGLISH
您当前的位置是:首页->详细浏览

期刊名称: Continental Philosophy Review
Volume:51    Issue:2        Page:239-268
ISSN:1387-2842

On (the) nothing: Heidegger and Nishida期刊论文

作者: Krummel John W. M
DOI:10.1007/s11007-017-9419-3

服务链接:
页码: 239-268
被引频次: 1
出版者: Springer Netherlands,SPRINGER,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
期刊名称: Continental Philosophy Review
ISSN: 1387-2842
卷期: Volume:51    Issue:2
语言: English
摘要: Two major twentieth century philosophers, of East and West, for whom the nothing is a significant concept are Nishida Kitarō and Martin Heidegger. Nishida’s basic concept is the absolute nothing (zettai mu) upon which the being of all is predicated. Heidegger, on the other hand, thematizes the nothing (Nichts) as the ulterior aspect of being. Both are responding to Western metaphysics that tends to substantialize being and dichotomize the real. Ironically, however, while Nishida regarded Heidegger as still trapped within the confines of Western metaphysics with its tendency to objectify, Heidegger’s impression of Nishida was that he is too Western, that is, metaphysical. Yet neither was too familiar with the other’s philosophical work as a whole. I thus compare and assess Nishida’s and Heidegger’s discussions of the nothing in their attempts to undermine traditional metaphysics while examining lingering assumptions about the Nishida–Heidegger relationship. Neither Nishida nor Heidegger means by “nothing” a literal nothing, but rather that which permits beings in their relative determinacy to be what they are and wherein or whereby we find ourselves always already in our comportment to beings. Nishida characterizes this as a place (basho) that negates itself to give rise to, or make room for, beings. For Heidegger, being as an event (Ereignis) that clears room for beings, releasing each into its own, is not a being, hence nothing. We may also contrast them on the basis of the language they employ in discussing the nothing. Yet each seemed to have had an intuitive grasp of an un/ground, foundational to experience and being. And in fact their paths cross in their respective critiques of Western substantialism, where they offer as an alterantive to that substantialist ontology, in different ways, what I call anontology.
相关主题: Phenomenology, Heidegger, Political Philosophy, nothing, Philosophy of Man, place, being, event, Philosophy, Nishida, PHILOSOPHY, Metaphysics, Ontology, Existentialism,

相关文献推荐:

问图书管理员更多图书管理员

学科咨询馆员
学科馆员

电话:
邮件:
问图书馆员

图标说明

在线获取原文 原文传递 详细信息 图书在架状态 图书馆际互借 问图书馆员

常见问题

图书馆开放时间 图书馆位置 借阅要求 您在使用中发现的任何错误,都可以向我们 【报告错误】,非常感谢!

作者信息:×